The Conficker Conundrum
The Conficker worm was a particularly damaging strain of virus, using advanced malware techniques, and it has continued to spread through removable devices more than one year after its first appearance. Mitigating these types of threats requires not only effective security solutions, but also education and legislation from the ‘top down'.
More than a year has passed since Conficker first appeared, yet it is still making the news. The patch for the vulnerability exploited by Conficker was published by Microsoft in October 2008. Yet more than one year later, Conficker continues to infect computers using many advanced malware techniques and exploiting the Windows MS08-067 service vulnerability.
The spread of Conficker impacted all types of institutions and organisations. Victims included the British military, Ealing Council's entire IT network was disabled for 4 days, and 800 computers from the Sheffield NHS Trust were infected as well as numerous other companies and organisations worldwide. Microsoft even offered a reward of $250,000 to anyone providing information that led to the arrest and conviction of the creators of this malware.
The Conficker worm, which by nature is a particularly damaging strain of virus, appears to be launching brute force attacks to extract passwords from computers and corporate networks. The easier the password, the easier it is for Conficker to decipher it. Once the passwords are detected, cyber criminals can then access computers and use them for their own ends.
Another reason for the longevity of this worm is that many people are using pirated copies of Windows and, in fear of being detected; they avoid applying the security patches published periodically by Microsoft. In fact, Microsoft allows unrestricted application of critical updates, even on non-legitimate copies of its operating system. Nowadays, most companies have perimeter protection (firewall, etc.), but this does not prevent employees from taking their memory sticks to work, connecting them to the workstation and spreading the malicious code across the network. As this worm can affect all types of USB devices, MP3 players, mobile phones, cameras, and other removable devices are also at risk.
So what can users do to mitigate this threat? Users should firstly apply the patch to solve the security issue that lets the Conficker worm spread through the Internet (MS08-067); they then need other solutions such as a USB vaccine protecting not just the computer but also the USB device itself.
A security solution which is regularly updated and active should be enough to protect against Conficker and its variants but organisations should alsohabitually scan for vulnerable machines, disinfect infected machines using updated and active antivirus both on networks and stand-alone PCs and make sure their antivirus and security solutions are up-to-date on the latest version and signature database.
It is important to note that by just asking people to use a security solution, we should not expect to put a halt to the problem. Making users aware of the threats, teaching children at school how to use technology safely and responsively, and ensuring they have privacy in mind are equally important. Many users are unaware of the dangers, and living under the perception that the digital world is secure, and as we know, that is not the case.Preventative measures must also come from the ‘top-down', legislating, chasing and punishing those that benefit from cybercrime and protecting critical infrastructure.
Panda Security is exhibiting at Infosecurity Europe 2010, the No. 1 industry event in Europe held on 27th – 29th April in its new venue Earl's Court, London. The event provides an unrivalled free education programme, exhibitors showcasing new and emerging technologies and offering practical and professional expertise. For further information please visit www.infosec.co.uk