The Complex Collaboration/UC Relationship

Jason Fitzpatrick at Lifehacker has posted the results to a request from his visitors to identify the five best collaboration tools.

By Carl Weinschenk | Dec 21, 2009
Print ArticleEmail Article
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on LinkedIn

Jason Fitzpatrick at Lifehacker has posted the results to a request from his visitors to identify the five best collaboration tools. Jason Fitzpatrick at Lifehacker has posted the results to a request from his visitors to identify the five best collaboration tools. The winners were Basecamp (coincidentally, used by Unified Communications Edge, IT Business Edge and our growing stable of network sites), Google Wave, Microsoft Office Sharepoint, Google Docs and plain old e-mail.

It is possible to almost see the evolution of the category in real time. Smart designers and engineers are doing what technologists always try to do: Simultaneously simplify the user interface while making the underlying functionality deeper and richer.

The most useful and accessible tools remain e-mail and telephone, however. The other platforms chosen by Lifehacker's visitors certainly provide invaluable functions. They do a much better job than base e-mail in almost every area. The platforms efficiently distribute complex documents, facilitate high-end communications and create user-friendly and searchable archives of collaborative sessions.

E-mail – and the good old telephone, for that matter – were first on the scene, however, and long ago won the hearts and minds of users. It's up to the new products to integrate with those tools, not vice versa.

Reading the Lifehacker list led me to what I feel is a key question: What, exactly, is the difference between a collaboration and unified communications? Are they synonymous? Are they separate tools but so closely linked that any difference matters only to those in the business and the journalists who cover them?

For my money, there is one key differentiator. Collaboration tools that lack presence and escalation functions are fundamentally different than unified communications platforms in which it is possible to find group members who are not at their desks and to change the applications that are being used as the need of session participants change. It is likely that the presence and escalation function require deeper integration with the company's core infrastructure than the data-centric Web-based collaboration tools demand.

Comment and Contribute
(Maximum characters: 1200). You have
characters left.
Get the Latest Scoop with Enterprise Networking Planet Newsletter
Helpful Links
  • Yankee Group Mobile WAN Optimization Report

    Mobile work continues to evolve. Your organization must keep up with the demands of its mobile workforce. This report introduces the concept of mobile WAN optimization and provides three case studies including RCM, PRTM and Einstein that highlight how this emerging technology can help IT departments achieve what previously appeared to be conflicting goals. Read >

  • Network Security Resources

    More threats than ever before pose a danger to today's enterprise network. Get the latest tips and intel on the newest risks in our guide to network security resources. Read >

  • Extreme Savings: Cutting Costs with WAN Optimization

    Did you know it's possible to cut IT costs without impacting day-to-day IT operations? In fact, when you download this whitepaper from Riverbed on cost-savings through WAN optimization, you'll discover how businesses of all different sizes have realized a return on investment in just a few months through significant hard cost savings in areas such as bandwidth reduction and IT consolidation. It's called Extreme Savings and its only from Riverbed. Read >